Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest is legal: San Beda law dean dismisses ‘political persecution’ claims

The arrest of former president Rodrigo Duterte is legally sound and not an act of political persecution, according to Fr. Ranhilio Aquino, dean of the San Beda Graduate School of Law.

Aquino, a legal expert and columnist, emphasized that the country’s legal framework recognizes international jurisdiction in cases of crimes against humanity. He stated that Duterte’s arrest was carried out in accordance with the law and should not be misinterpreted as a politically driven action.

“The law is clear—our domestic legal framework recognizes international jurisdiction in cases of crimes against humanity,” he said. “Duterte’s arrest is not a matter of political persecution; it is a matter of justice and adherence to our legal commitments.”

The former president was taken into custody following a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in connection with allegations of extrajudicial killings linked to his administration’s war on drugs. His arrest has sparked heated debates, with supporters claiming it was politically motivated while legal experts argue otherwise.

Read More:  More than 1,100 PNP personnel face penalties amid internal cleansing drive

Political Persecution or Legal Obligation?

Duterte’s allies have argued that his arrest is part of a broader political effort to silence opposition figures. However, legal scholars, including Aquino, maintain that the move aligns with the country’s legal obligations.

The Philippines, despite its withdrawal from the ICC in 2019, remains subject to the court’s jurisdiction over crimes committed before its exit. Legal experts have pointed out that Duterte’s war on drugs fell under this timeframe, making him accountable under international law.

Aquino stressed that adherence to international agreements and justice systems strengthens the country’s legal integrity. He dismissed suggestions that the case was fueled by political vendettas, saying that justice must take precedence over personal or political interests.

Read More:  Ombudsman recommends plunder case vs Marcoleta

What’s Next for Duterte?

Following his arrest, Duterte’s legal team is expected to challenge the case, arguing against ICC jurisdiction. His supporters have also vowed to push back, calling for his immediate release and condemning what they see as foreign interference.

Meanwhile, human rights groups and international legal experts continue to support the ICC’s actions, stating that accountability for alleged crimes is a crucial step toward justice.

As legal battles unfold, Aquino reiterated that the case should be viewed through the lens of law rather than politics. He urged the public to trust the legal process and refrain from misinformation or politically charged narratives.

With tensions rising, Duterte’s arrest remains a divisive issue, but legal experts insist that the focus should remain on justice, the rule of law, and the country’s commitment to international legal standards.