Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who stepped down from their royal duties five years ago, are facing new accusations about their behavior toward staff. According to a recent Vanity Fair report, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly insist that their employees address them as “sir” and “ma’am,” despite having left their royal status behind.
This revelation has reignited criticism of the couple, who have frequently been at the center of public and media scrutiny since their departure from the British royal family.
Demanding Titles: ‘Sir’ and ‘Ma’am’ Required
Former staff members shared their experiences with Vanity Fair, describing how they were instructed to use the royal-style titles while addressing the couple. One source explained, “It’s about cachet and setting themselves apart as special. They may have left the royal family, but they seem to want to keep the prestige that comes with the titles.”
These allegations extend beyond their private household. Staff who worked on Meghan’s Archetypes podcast and Harry’s book tour also claimed they were given the same instructions. Another insider speculated that the couple’s insistence on being addressed this way reflects a desire to maintain a rare form of status, stating, “In the U.S., fame and money are common, but a blood title is unique.”
Not the First Time Such Accusations Have Surfaced
This is not the first time Prince Harry and Meghan have been accused of clinging to royal formalities. Scott Moore, CEO of the Invictus Games—a competition founded by Prince Harry—has previously revealed being told that “Ma’am is fine” for Meghan and “Sir” for Harry.
Traditionally, members of the British royal family are addressed as “Your Royal Highness” or “Sir” and “Ma’am.” However, these reports suggest that Harry and Meghan, despite distancing themselves from their royal responsibilities, still prefer these forms of address, raising questions about their intentions.
Staff Work Conditions Under Scrutiny
The Vanity Fair article also delves into claims of difficult working conditions for those employed by the Sussexes. Former staff alleged a high-pressure environment, with some saying they felt forced into therapy after their time working for the couple.
Critics argue that these revelations clash with Harry and Meghan’s public image as advocates for mental health and equality. Their insistence on being treated with royal deference has led some to question the authenticity of their commitment to stepping away from the monarchy’s privileges.
Mixed Reactions from the Public
The allegations have sparked a mix of outrage and defense on social media. While critics accuse the couple of hypocrisy, their supporters argue that such forms of address are a sign of respect and professionalism, not entitlement.
As Prince Harry and Meghan continue their endeavors in the United States, including media productions and advocacy work, these claims are likely to further fuel debates about their transition from royal life to private citizens.
Jaja has a degree in journalism and took classes in international law and business communication. Her career spans roles at prominent international media outlets, including International Business Times, Celebeat and Delightful Philippines. As a news editor, Jaja covered a wide range of beats, including legal, business, economy, cryptocurrency, personal finance, gaming, technology, and entertainment.